There is quite a bit of chat on this topic here: Gas Mileage and more on why high grade only refers to a higher octane number and not quality: Fuel Grade TechThe manual say’s high grade fuel is not necessary. I ran one tank of 93 octane and my last fill up I just put in 87. What are you guys/gals running?
First off, if you have single wall chrome pipe (and we all know that you do) it will eventually be blue, bronze and chrome in that order from the exhaust port down. That's what happens when ya gotta take the heat. Double wall pipes hide the heat discoloration.I am confused.
Does lower octane mean slower burning?
If you run higher octane and that translates to higher temperature would that cause your nice shinny chrome pipes to turn colors?
Thanks.
T
Garc,First off, if you have single wall chrome pipe (and we all know that you do) it will eventually be blue, bronze and chrome in that order from the exhaust port down. That's what happens when ya gotta take the heat. Double wall pipes hide the heat discoloration.
Regular fuel is like Classic Coke; it's the original. Well not quite; it's sugar/lead free.
Premium fuel was developed for engines that operate at higher combustion pressures (not necessarily higher compression ratios). Theses high pressures cause regular fuel to burn too quickly (higher volatility) so they added a little "molasses" to make high octane gasoline burn slower, control the pressure rise and prevent detonation or "pinging". Temperatures are only higher due to higher pressure, not the fuel. It actually runs cooler in the Fury but no, it won't stop your pipes from blueing.
So it would appear that you get more bang for your buck with regular in your Fury. Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus!
For a more technical exposé click here.
It's all a question of degree ~ pun intended....the manufacture of the new pipes stated I should not install them until I have installed a fuel controller... I am just wondering why not having the FC will have such an impact on the pipes chrome? Since the engine would be running lean = engine running hotter with the new pipes; will the additional increase in temp be that much different?...
I would jump in there and offer an answer for ya but then Cycho would book-argue with about 3 million words thrown against what I've found in my experiences with V-twin engines and then ending with "well probably we basically agree" or some such other stuff...heheheheh. You may have read already, I installed the V&H Cruzers almost 2000 miles ago (did no airbox changes Cycho) and driveability is FINE, no back-fires, no lean conditions shown, plugs look good, and NO BLUING. Granted, this is one motorcycle, and one particular set of pipes. But there are variables so don't just run up to the cliff and jump off; follow up for a while. Point is, my exhaust change not only worked (no lean conditions), it worked as expected (due to no air-box changes), and I kept a close eye on it the first few miles to make sure there were no lean conditions (driveability, plugs check, etc.). If you follow this course, you'll be safe from doing damage. And as Garth said, you will get some discoloration, regardless of how "fat" you make the mixture. And as an aside, every bit of fuel you add to the mix also (in addition to some performance improvement) also takes away from mpg. Find a good compromise!Garc,
Thank you for the wealth of information. One question - the manufacture of the new pipes stated I should not install them until I have installed a fuel controller... I am just wondering why not having the FC will have such an impact on the pipes chrome? Since the engine would be running lean = engine running hotter with the new pipes; will the additional increase in temp be that much different?
In advance, thanks!
T
Using higher than needed is wasting money and usually results in incomplete combustion. If you ever saw a head all carboned up from unburned fuel you might form a different opinion.I use 93. Always have and always will in my bikes.